Difference between revisions of "Stronghold Meeting - 26-Jan-2016"
From DEW Robotics
MaiKangWei (talk | contribs) (→CAD & Design) |
MaiKangWei (talk | contribs) (→CAD & Design) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==CAD & Design== | ==CAD & Design== | ||
− | Final decision to use tracked tank drive had been made via email conference during the snowstorms. | + | Final decision to use tracked tank drive had been made via email conference during the snowstorms. Mentor [[User:Aweissman7 | Andrew Weissman]] summarized the team's thinking an a xx-Jan email: |
+ | |||
+ | :''My thoughts on the drivetrain decision:'' | ||
+ | :''Based upon the evidence presented by both the video from 1635 and our modded kitbot, both are able to drive over Category B and D defenses. However, the 8WD bot showed considerable difficulty driving over the moat at a level consistent with what is required for this game (at least that was the impression I got driving over it). Also, while driving over some of the obstacles, the bounce experienced would be enough to potentially cause removal of a boulder from robot possession (depends on other mechanisms). This problem was exaggerated by the lightweight nature of the 8WD bot, but may still remain present with a fully loaded bot(mechanisms-pending). The tread drive appeared to climb over all Category B and D defenses without much issue (except the ramparts, but that was a design flaw with the robot they used with having too low of a bellypan).'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | :''I still believe that the treads pose a considerable risk, but the 8WD did not perform as well as required for this game with all B and D defenses, making the treads a better option for crossing the defenses.'' | ||
+ | |||
<gallery widths=250 heights=250 perrow=3> | <gallery widths=250 heights=250 perrow=3> |
Revision as of 11:37, 27 January 2016
Contents
Competition Season Meeting
Meeting Date | Meeting Time | Location | Attendees |
---|---|---|---|
26-January-2016 | 5:00-9:00PM | TCHS Brandywine |
CAD & Design
Final decision to use tracked tank drive had been made via email conference during the snowstorms. Mentor Andrew Weissman summarized the team's thinking an a xx-Jan email:
- My thoughts on the drivetrain decision:
- Based upon the evidence presented by both the video from 1635 and our modded kitbot, both are able to drive over Category B and D defenses. However, the 8WD bot showed considerable difficulty driving over the moat at a level consistent with what is required for this game (at least that was the impression I got driving over it). Also, while driving over some of the obstacles, the bounce experienced would be enough to potentially cause removal of a boulder from robot possession (depends on other mechanisms). This problem was exaggerated by the lightweight nature of the 8WD bot, but may still remain present with a fully loaded bot(mechanisms-pending). The tread drive appeared to climb over all Category B and D defenses without much issue (except the ramparts, but that was a design flaw with the robot they used with having too low of a bellypan).
- I still believe that the treads pose a considerable risk, but the 8WD did not perform as well as required for this game with all B and D defenses, making the treads a better option for crossing the defenses.
Start of chassis design ( pdf)
Right side tracked drive assembly ( pdf)
track drive sprocket ( pdf)
Large track idler pulley ( pdf)
Small track idler pulley ( pdf)
Trackway interior plate ( pdf)
Trackway exterior plate ( pdf)
Mechanical
Programming
Strategy
Field Elements
Other
Recorded by: | Date: | Journal Editor: | Date: |
---|---|---|---|