From DEW Robotics
Jump to: navigation, search
6wd vex prototype chassis

6-Wheel-Drive Tank drive-trains are one of the more popular and successful drive-trains employed by FRC robots. Team 1640 learned why during our 2008 summer drive-train prototyping and testing. Hitherto, all of Team 1640's robots had been 4-wheel with either 2wd or 4wd Tank drive-trains.

6wd vex prototype chassis

A ½-scale 6wd prototype was desiged and built using Vex parts. Dimensions are shown at left. Based on our Twitch experience, we would have expected this prototype to be difficult to steer. It was not. This discovery led us to embark on a careful analysis of drive-train behavior.

A detailed analysis can be seen in the Microsoft Powerpoint Team 1640 Drive-train Lesson.

The key conclusion is that in changing from 4wd to 6wd Tank drive (and keeping all else constant), the frictional resistance to turning is significantly reduced. This occurs even when the middle wheels are kept on the same plane as the front and rear (many teams lower the middle wheels relative to the other). The key benefit of 6wd versus 4wd is therefore improved steering capability and greater available turning torque.

A secondary benefit would be in avoidance of bottoming out when climbing ramps.

6wd should not provide more traction than 4wd (again, all other things being equal - robot weight, drive power per side, gearing, wheel base, wheel friction coefficients). This premise is based on calculation and was not tested.

Sacrifices associated with the change from 4wd to 6wd are:

  • Increased weight
  • Increased complexity
  • 6wd imposes design constraints

Conclusions & follow-up

6wd prototype testing and the detailed analysis drive-train analysis it inspired made it clear that the 6wd tank drive-train offered clear performance benefits over 4wd and was a good drive-train choice for a wide range of competitive situations.

During the Fall of 2008, we therefore prepared a design for a good, general-purpose Hypothetical 6wd Chassis & Drive-train with the thought that this could serve as the chassis for our next robot. While it did not (due to special challenges associated with Lunacy), the thought process which went into the design and analysis proved invaluable in designing DEWBOT V.

2008 Drive-train Development