Difference between revisions of "DEWBOT VII Drive Train"
MaiKangWei (talk | contribs) (→Angle sensor & calibration) |
MaiKangWei (talk | contribs) (→Angle sensor & calibration) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
There are Left & Right modules. A robot has (2) of each. All left modules are identical and interchangable, as are all right modules. Identical includes angle calibration. | There are Left & Right modules. A robot has (2) of each. All left modules are identical and interchangable, as are all right modules. Identical includes angle calibration. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Steering== | ||
| + | Banebots RS-540 motors with Banebots 256:1 reduction 4-stage planetary gearboxes were selected for steering. The gearbox's ½" shaft drives a 32-tooth HTD5 synchonous belt pulley and is also hard coupled to the Pivot's angle sensor (as with last year's pivot, the steering motor shaft angle is used as a surrogate for the pivot angle). The 1" OD pivot tube has a driven 32-tooth HTD5 synchronous belt pulley. A 360mm HTD5 x 15mm wide belt connects the drive and driven 32T steering pulleys (1:1). | ||
==Angle sensor & calibration== | ==Angle sensor & calibration== | ||
Mentor Gary Deaver selected [http://datasheet.octopart.com/981HE0B4WA1F16-Vishay-datasheet-6387172.pdf Vishay 981HE0B4WA1F16] absolute encoders in lieu of last year's [http://www.cherrycorp.com/english/sensors/Rotary_Position/an8.htm Cherry AN8] encoders due to better accuracy and lower cost ($28 v. $38 ea.). Good call. | Mentor Gary Deaver selected [http://datasheet.octopart.com/981HE0B4WA1F16-Vishay-datasheet-6387172.pdf Vishay 981HE0B4WA1F16] absolute encoders in lieu of last year's [http://www.cherrycorp.com/english/sensors/Rotary_Position/an8.htm Cherry AN8] encoders due to better accuracy and lower cost ($28 v. $38 ea.). Good call. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Vishay sensors have ¼" "D"-shafts which are hard-coupled with the steering gearbox shafts. Polycarbonate mounting rings were machined which have #8-32 thr'd mounting holes at 20° intervals over a full circle. As the Vishay sensor mounting slots have +/-10° adjustment slots, these mounts allow full mechanical calibration of the sensors. All sensors were calibrated identically, thereby allowing easy Pivot Module replacement. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT VII]][[Category:Drive-train]] | [[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT VII]][[Category:Drive-train]] | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 12 March 2011
January 10th 2011: The big debate of the night The Drive Train. Pivot vs. Tank (6W)
Probably one of the most important decision to make for the robot. There were many pros and cons for both sides. Do you continue with the drive train you used last year, with the increased knowledge on how to build, program and drive it, and the added agility that come with but lose the 8 motors it takes and the amount of processor resources it will eat up?
Or...
Do you go with a simpler design, with can be created quickly, anyone can drive, uses less motors and processor, and can leave more time for working other aspects of the robot. However with this, sacrifice the maneuverability of the other option. While everyones input was listened to, the two main groups that needed to answer this were our drivers and our programmers.
The winner: Pivot, Our programmers and drivers were confident in their skills it may seem as a higher risk but will definitely yield a higher reward. Driver & Co-Captain Carly was adament: "This is a key competitive advantage for the team, and we've already made the investment to develop it!". We decided to go with what was our most valuable asset last year, agility. We were the fastest most agile Bot out there. This season is certainly shaping up to be a challenging one indeed.
Contents
Pivot developments since the 2010 season
- The joint between the pivot top and pivot tube failed on two occassions. This needs to be made more reliable.
- The time required to change a pivot if it fails is too long. This needs to be reduced to 5 minutes.
- Setscrews loosen, and as a result the transfer axle tended to drift. A redesign is needed to prevent drift without reliance on set screws.
- Weight reduction.
On 22-Nov, the team ran a Value Engineering session on the 2010 Pivot Drive design, which included a "Straw Man" proposal for a modular Pivot Unit. With a modular Pivot Unit, pivot replacement during a competition would entail module replacement, with the module including the drive and steering motors and the angle sensor.
Based on the feedback received on the "Straw Man", an improved "Wooden Man" (pdf) design was developed to elicit further critique. This "Wooden Man" design provided the starting point for the 2011 pivot drive design.
Strengthening the Pivot Top / Pivot Tube Joint
The 2010 pivot design utilized a tight fit between the hole in the pivot top and the inserted pivot tube. The insertion depth was 3/8". the joint was epoxied and three 8-32 set screws were threaded into the joint at 120° intervals to strengthen the joint and prevent rotation. (6) such pivots were produces in 2010 (4 for use and 2 spares). Two failed in service (during off-season competitions). Pivots which failed in this way could not be repaired.
The 2011 pivot addresses this deficiency by:
- The insertion depth is is increased to 1/2".
- A thermal interference fit between the pivot top hole and pivot tube is employed. The hole is undersized by 0.0025". Prior to assembly, the pivot tops are heated to 450°F to expand the hole enough to allow the tube to fit. Assembly must be done quickly!
Torture testing shows the new joints to be very strong (we haven't been able to break them).
Modular Design to cut replacement time
If a 2010 pivot needed to be replaced with a spare, the process required no less than 30 minutes. On the two (off-season) occassions when pivots failed in our busy 2010 season, this meant that Sab-BOT-age missed a match each time; letting down alliance partners. This is unacceptable.
In addition to having more reliable pivots in 2011, a key objective was to reduce pivot change time to 5 min maximum, thereby avoiding missed matches. We achieved this goal.
We achieved it by making the pivot a module which includes the Pivot, CIM drive motor, steering motor & gearbox, angle sensor and the transmission connecting these components. The pivot module can be replaced by removing (5) bolts and (5) electrical connections; then reversing the procedure.
There are Left & Right modules. A robot has (2) of each. All left modules are identical and interchangable, as are all right modules. Identical includes angle calibration.
Steering
Banebots RS-540 motors with Banebots 256:1 reduction 4-stage planetary gearboxes were selected for steering. The gearbox's ½" shaft drives a 32-tooth HTD5 synchonous belt pulley and is also hard coupled to the Pivot's angle sensor (as with last year's pivot, the steering motor shaft angle is used as a surrogate for the pivot angle). The 1" OD pivot tube has a driven 32-tooth HTD5 synchronous belt pulley. A 360mm HTD5 x 15mm wide belt connects the drive and driven 32T steering pulleys (1:1).
Angle sensor & calibration
Mentor Gary Deaver selected Vishay 981HE0B4WA1F16 absolute encoders in lieu of last year's Cherry AN8 encoders due to better accuracy and lower cost ($28 v. $38 ea.). Good call.
Vishay sensors have ¼" "D"-shafts which are hard-coupled with the steering gearbox shafts. Polycarbonate mounting rings were machined which have #8-32 thr'd mounting holes at 20° intervals over a full circle. As the Vishay sensor mounting slots have +/-10° adjustment slots, these mounts allow full mechanical calibration of the sensors. All sensors were calibrated identically, thereby allowing easy Pivot Module replacement.
