Difference between revisions of "DEWBOT XI 3-Tote Autonomous"

From DEW Robotics
Jump to: navigation, search
(Development)
(Development)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Like the RC Burglars, 3-Tote Autonomous was identified at the outset as a high-priority objective.  But this was a tough challenge to achieve.   
 
Like the RC Burglars, 3-Tote Autonomous was identified at the outset as a high-priority objective.  But this was a tough challenge to achieve.   
  
So the tough part of this are the two RCs between the three yellow totes.  They are in the way.  The team's initial approaches towards this challenge relied on  
+
So the tough part of this are the two RCs between the three yellow totes.  They are in the way.  The team's initial approaches towards this challenge relied on software and sensors exclusively (without any dedicated mechanical devices) to either maneuver around or push away the RCs.  Reluctance to add an additional mechanical device was driven by robot weight concerns prior to completing (and weighing in) the RC Burglars.  These initial attempts failed for a combination of reasons:
 +
# They were too slow and did not complete the routine in 15 s.
 +
#
  
 
----
 
----
 
[[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT XI]][[Category:Engineering]]
 
[[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT XI]][[Category:Engineering]]

Revision as of 23:11, 31 May 2015

3-Tote Autonomous - Archimedes Qualifier
The only worthwhile alternative to autonomous RC Burglars is 3-Tote Autonomous. The ideal alliance (ours during Archimedes Eliminations, for example) possesses two robots with fast double RC Burglars and one with a reliable 3-Tote Autonomous.

Autonomous Strategies

When we reviewed the game rules, we were immediately set 3-tote autonomous as a goal, but it was going to be difficult. We also thought that alliances would succeed in scoring robot, Tote & RC sets during many of not most matches. We were very wrong in this regard.

In a highly competitive match, two autonomous strategies make sense:

  1. Fast Can (RC) Burglaring. A robot should secure two RCs from the step during the first second or so of autonomous. In a highly competitive match, it should be assumed that all step RC will be controlled by one alliance or the other during the first second (or so) of the match.
  2. 3-Tote Autonomous. This is the only autonomous routine which will score points (and significant points at that) during autonomous without reliance on alliance partners

An ideal alliance in a competitive match would comprise two robots having fast double RC Burglars and one robot with reliable 3-Tote Autonomous.

Development

Like the RC Burglars, 3-Tote Autonomous was identified at the outset as a high-priority objective. But this was a tough challenge to achieve.

So the tough part of this are the two RCs between the three yellow totes. They are in the way. The team's initial approaches towards this challenge relied on software and sensors exclusively (without any dedicated mechanical devices) to either maneuver around or push away the RCs. Reluctance to add an additional mechanical device was driven by robot weight concerns prior to completing (and weighing in) the RC Burglars. These initial attempts failed for a combination of reasons:

  1. They were too slow and did not complete the routine in 15 s.