Difference between revisions of "FTC 7314 Engineering Notebook 2015-09-19"
From DEW Robotics
Akhila2014 (talk | contribs) |
Akhila2014 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Debris Intake''' | | '''Debris Intake''' | ||
− | + | ||
+ | * Trent came up with a design for an intake that involved a box that lifts 1 piece of debris at at time on a vertical conveyor belt. | ||
* Myles worked on the idea he had for the intake which scooped balls into a container. Myles thought that it will be more compact than other ideas given to Braden. | * Myles worked on the idea he had for the intake which scooped balls into a container. Myles thought that it will be more compact than other ideas given to Braden. | ||
*Braden worked on building a chassis for the intake designs and other designs for getting debris. | *Braden worked on building a chassis for the intake designs and other designs for getting debris. | ||
* Braden, Amal, Myles, and Trent were part of the intake section. | * Braden, Amal, Myles, and Trent were part of the intake section. | ||
− | *Amal's idea was like a circular intake like a loop going into a pole | + | *Amal's idea was like a circular intake like a loop going into a pole, as well as collecting it into a tube. |
|- | |- | ||
| '''Debris Storage''' | | '''Debris Storage''' | ||
Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
| | | | ||
* Using this summer's test chassis, we ran some climbing tests. No trouble with the low section and climbing the 30 deg ramp. The robot's 4" front wheels were able to get over the lowest two 1/2" hex horizontal bars, but after this the bottom of the chassis frame's contact with the lowest horizontal bar prevented the rear wheel from achieving contact with the ramp. Conclusion is that more ground clearance is needed to climb the mid portion of the mountain using wheels. | * Using this summer's test chassis, we ran some climbing tests. No trouble with the low section and climbing the 30 deg ramp. The robot's 4" front wheels were able to get over the lowest two 1/2" hex horizontal bars, but after this the bottom of the chassis frame's contact with the lowest horizontal bar prevented the rear wheel from achieving contact with the ramp. Conclusion is that more ground clearance is needed to climb the mid portion of the mountain using wheels. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | '''Debris Storage''' | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | * Josh, Wade and Snarr were part of the storage section. | ||
+ | *The three pondered storage ideas throughout most of the meeting but could not agree on a storage solution. | ||
+ | * the team worked on ideas for the debris. scoring collecting and storing we split up into groups and worked on 1 of the three tasks the team that was working on scoring and storing teamed up later had shared ideas. | ||
+ | *Bennett helped Wade refine his design for the robot. | ||
+ | *Team scoring worked on a way to take that ideas from team storage came up with and an idea to get the debris into the holder. | ||
+ | *Daniel, Bennett, and Justin worked on scoring and decided that, depending on the drive train, they are doing a shooter or a slider, they decided this because a slider would be most efficient but if it was hard to climb the mountain, shooting would be more effective. | ||
|} <!-- End of tasks table; DO NOT REMOVE --> | |} <!-- End of tasks table; DO NOT REMOVE --> |
Revision as of 02:42, 30 November 2015
Competition Season Meeting
Meeting Date | Meeting Time | Location | Attendees |
---|---|---|---|
Saturday, 19-September-2015 | 2:00-4:00pm | TCHS Brandywine | Josh, Justin, Braden, Amal, Bennett, Wade, Daniel, Trent, Jacob, Myles |
Objectives / Systems | Hypotheses, tests, observations, conclusions, plans |
---|---|
Climb the Mountain |
|
Debris Intake
| |
Debris Storage |
|
Tasks | Reflections |
---|---|
Center of Mass |
|
Climbing Test |
|
Debris Storage |
|
Action and idea Journal
Recorded by: | Date: | Journal Editor: | Date: |
---|---|---|---|