Difference between revisions of "3-Wheel Swerve"

From DEW Robotics
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
Image:Pentabot111.jpg|Pentagonal design based on 111" perimeter.  Casters to be located at the (2) vacant positions to improve stability.
 
Image:Pentabot111.jpg|Pentagonal design based on 111" perimeter.  Casters to be located at the (2) vacant positions to improve stability.
 
Image:Tribot_130711_csm.jpg|Pentagonal prototype
 
Image:Tribot_130711_csm.jpg|Pentagonal prototype
 +
Image:Polygon_round_chassis_stability.jpg|Angular chassis stability of polygonal and round chassis of 111 inch perimeter having 3 to 6 pivots arranged on a regular polygonal pattern with pivot axes 2.7 in from the perimeter
 +
Image:Stability_max_min_chart.jpg|Maximum & minimum stability for the same set of chassis
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
 
----
 
----
 
[[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT IX]][[Category:Drive-train]][[Category:Pivot Drive]][[Category:Photo Galleries]]
 
[[Category:Robot]][[Category:DEWBOT IX]][[Category:Drive-train]][[Category:Pivot Drive]][[Category:Photo Galleries]]

Revision as of 21:29, 5 August 2013

The 2013 change in perimeter rules (112 in overall perimeter vis-à-vis 28in x 38 in) open new potentials for non-rectangular robots. The team decided to explore this.

In particular, the new rules enable the design of a 3-wheeled robot without paying as large a penalty in terms of reduced stability. Potential benefits of a 3-wheeled drive-train are reduced drive-train and chassis weight, and/or a drive-train with enhanced features (which might otherwise been impractical due to drive-train weight). Additionally, a 3-wheeled swerve robot reduce burden on the cRIO. A tiangular chassis robot may be able to break a blockage by opposing robots more easily than a rectangular chassis robot due to the reduced corner angle.