3-Wheel Swerve
The 2013 change in perimeter rules (112 in overall perimeter vis-à-vis 28in x 38 in) open new potentials for non-rectangular robots. The team decided to explore this.
In particular, the new rules enable the design of a 3-wheeled robot without paying as large a penalty in terms of reduced stability. Potential benefits of a 3-wheeled drive-train are reduced drive-train and chassis weight, and/or a drive-train with enhanced features (which might otherwise been impractical due to drive-train weight). Additionally, a 3-wheeled swerve robot reduce burden on the cRIO. A tiangular chassis robot may be able to break a blockage by opposing robots more easily than a rectangular chassis robot due to the reduced corner angle.
Equilateral triangle design on 111" perimeter
Prototype design based on 111" geometry showing electronics locations
Equilateral swerve in a round chassis on 111" perimeter
Equilateral design
Pentagonal design based on 111" perimeter. Casters to be located at the (2) vacant positions to improve stability.
Pentagonal prototype
Chassis stability is measured by the outer perimeter of the pivot axes (or casters, if these replace pivots). If the acceleration and incline adjusted projection of the robot's center of mass remains in this perimeter, the robot remains upright; but if that projection falls outside
Angular chassis stability of polygonal and round chassis of 111 inch perimeter having 3 to 6 pivots arranged on a regular polygonal pattern with pivot axes 2.7 in from the perimeter
Maximum & minimum stability for the same set of chassis
